a disaster! When those in politics to talk about real needs and not Millenovecento billion. In absolute terms is our debt. Audience, or: my your his. Thirty thousand Euros per head, 120% of GDP. Only pay interest eighty billion a year - equal to 6 such financial maneuvers. What a waste! But it was just that. The fact is that debt is costing us not only unsustainable avalanche of money. It costs us especially sovereignty. The vote's not my your is better than nothing, man. Let's admit the X on the name that most pleases, the other between a spesuccia, including a reform is not made and a different one instead (read:
counter-reform forensic ) and once again made no money (read :
University), well in this fooling around irrational, our appointed to the command have our heads in usufruct to those standards of rationality that are the primordial markets.
The politician has voted to make debt - has to be re-elected. More debt is, however, undermines the more democratic sovereignty - that is not his but those who vote - cedendone portions to those entities politically irresponsible, but accessible and democratically sortibili, which are the markets. The Germans have banned the debt in the Constitution. The constraint is a techno-constitutional legal-political instrument, of course. Precisely because it serves to protect democracy from the irresponsibility in the long term, politics.
What we are talking about a couple of years now? not market failure, gentlemen, but that - on a dramatic scale-Atlantic euro - politics. The debt is the fault of those who did, not the capitalists who have won - and who do well to consider, we irrational spenders, for what after all we: buffoons who do not even laugh more.
We come to us. Italy - remember about it - has a debt of close to 120% of its GDP asphyxiated. In 1992, when entering Maastricht, was 108. We had a commitment to take it to 60 - just as provided for in the Treaty. We happily fed instead of 12 point 12, which are something that people in these 18 years we had 18 in one way or the government - and that each of them now either government, are in opposition, took the ' idea of \u200b\u200bchange - should feel compelled to take responsibility, in the presence of the sovereign people, and explain that or the lights in the room and stops the 'dream', or to ensure that the sovereignty will not be raving that the gruesome farce election.
"There are three ways to reduce the indebtedness of a person" - Mario writes
Seminerio on Phastidio 
: debt repayment, and the "inflationary perturbations, which erode the real value of that debt" , or "default." We can not do
inflation, we would prefer not to default. That remains is to repay. Okkey, but it will be difficult as long as we continue to spend 20%
plus interests in more than they produce. We must reverse the ratio - increases in GDP which is the denominator, and reduce expenditure and related interest, which is the numerator.
To reduce the stock of debt there are those, like
Giuliano Amato, proposes to charge for 20 of those Italian taxpayers € 30,000 debt skull - perhaps, says the former prime minister, taking a more those who have more. Solution already practiced in its simplicity creepy. There are some who, like the PDL of the 2008 election campaign, claiming instead to sell part of the huge real estate portfolio. It was the
mission number seven of the electoral recently evoked by Benedetto Della Vedova in a very misunderstood
TV transmission, which in truth Berlusconi urged to remember that in this case would have sung un'osanna Fli.
Vender Màs is what Zapatero
, Ireland, Great Britain. We say this for a while ',
here on freedom, this is the road. The other day on
Sheet Cisnetto Henry even went as , boosting proposal Francesco Guarino, a public company for the marketization of capital public, who would resign from the Treasury but by those placed precisely on the market. Our debt
oversize suffer a rapid and significant weight loss. This means that in the eyes of the market we would look like a bad ex become a bad chick, which then return to look voluptuous trust.
Because the Germans have figured this - and practiced in the not so dramatically obliging - and we do not? Who is more faithful to respect for popular sovereignty, the German techno-tight or the jackals of the sovereignty of others Italiot that those who are in the almost five decades of government unlimited power did not nothing to plug the leak, you are indeed drink of that fountain debt
cum magno sed daunting joy?
Mignotte & Italian dictators are a problem - but above all a
Italian, his dignity and that of those who still supports him. The debt rather applies to all - and all equally. So even those '
a that December 15th will have the keys to restart.
The reasoning behind the promise Berlusconi was just reducing the weight of the state and debt in the life of the country. Berlusconi's political crisis stems from this: has not addressed nor solved these structural problems assume that anyone henceforth the responsibility of governing will receive an inheritance, left virtually untouched by those who have gvernato far. Well, untie knots, today, is the goal that Fli purports to achieve. And that means addressing the issue and deal with the root of the debt. However, serves more than a parliamentary majority to be able to win the mother of all enterprises: determining need, inter-institutional consensus, a sense of mission. Probably need only a caretaker government, at this stage, is able to provide.
Sounds bad, I know. It is accepted that the formalization of the political crisis will pave the way for a
'Commissioner' driven policy. Now, you may never be a government of wise, capable of, the influential, politically irresponsible to do in the two years that has not been done in eighteen from
democratically accountable? And if so, whether they - the names of Aristotle in this government if you have them - if they really were able to remedy the failure of democracy returns sovereignty of our common heritage - that makes bearable the burden of debt - well what will happen to policy ? Well, it matters democratically sensitive - I agree. But here we return the initial assumption: we are already
under a condition substantially sovereignty. Depend on markets, the IMF, from Europe. Institutionalized with the support of super-neutrality of the constitutional head of state, the limits of the policy initiative with technical 'to German', which has - it goes without saying - the active support of political forces that won the last election, I think would actually be a way to save our democracy, and with it we want sovereignty.
(LIBERTIAMO.it)
